Most hotels arrive at influencer marketing the same way. Requests come in, someone on the team handles them in between everything else, and it works well enough until it doesn't. Then the question becomes: what's the right way to actually run this?
The honest answer depends on your property, your volume, and how much of your team's time you're willing to spend. Here's a look at the real options, what each one is good at, and the questions worth asking before you commit to any of them.
If your property hosts two or three collaborations a year and someone on your team enjoys handling them, you may not need to change much about how you manage the process. Manual works fine at low volume, and no tool is worth buying to solve a workflow problem you don't have yet.
The one thing that doesn't scale down is vetting. Whether you host three creators a year or thirty, every collaboration costs you something: a room night, travel, a fee, your team's time. Whether that audience is real is the same question every time. At low volume it matters more, not less, because one bad collaboration is a bigger share of what you're spending.
The tipping point usually isn't a decision. It's when one of these happens:
If none of those apply, you may not need to change your workflow. The vetting question is still worth reading on.
These are the ways hotels run the day-to-day work: sourcing, coordinating, collecting content, reporting. Vetting is a separate question, and it cuts across all four, so I've kept it out of the comparison and come back to it below.
Handling it in-house, manually. Someone on your marketing team sources creators, reviews requests, negotiates, collects content, and compiles reports. It gives you full control, and at low volume it works.
Where it breaks down: the time. Sourcing, chasing content, and compiling reports are recurring work, and it grows with your roster. It's also the part of the job that's pure admin rather than strategy, which makes it the first thing to slip when your team gets busy.
Hiring an agency. A hospitality PR or social agency runs influencer campaigns as part of a broader engagement. You get strategy, relationships, and someone else doing the work.
Where it breaks down: it's the highest-cost option, because you're buying strategy and execution together rather than just tooling, and it often comes bundled with services you may not need. The creator relationships also live with the agency, which is worth knowing if you'd rather build your own over time. Great fit if you want the whole function handled and have the budget. Less efficient if what you actually need is a better way to manage the requests you're already getting.
Worth noting these aren't mutually exclusive. Plenty of agencies run influencer programs for their hotel clients using a solution like ours. If you're already working with one, the questions to ask are the same ones below: how are creators being vetted, and what data are those decisions based on?
Generalist influencer software. Large creator databases with search filters, campaign tools, and reporting. Built for consumer brands running product campaigns at scale.
Where it breaks down: what these tools sell is volume, and volume is mostly what you get. The databases are enormous but thin on genuine travel and food creators with audiences that book hotels, so your team spends its time filtering to find the same creators you could have found yourself, just with automation around the outreach. The workflows also assume you're shipping products rather than hosting stays. Strong tools if e-commerce is your world. Less so if hospitality is.
A hospitality-specific solution. Built around how hotel collaborations actually work: vetted travel and food creators, application-based rather than outbound sourcing, and stay-specific details like dates, room nights, and plus-ones built into the workflow.
Where it breaks down: the network is specialized, not general. Every creator is a travel, food, or lifestyle creator, which is exactly what you want when hospitality and travel are your world. It's the wrong fit if your marketing program spans categories well outside that, and you'd rather run everything through one general-purpose database.
Whatever direction you lean, these are the questions worth asking before you sign anything.
Where does the audience data come from? This is the one most hotels skip and the one that matters most. Public tools estimate audience authenticity from scraped data. Verified, first-party data comes from the creator's own account, shared with their permission. One is a guess. The other comes from the account itself. Ask which you're getting.
-> We went deeper on why public metrics mislead in this post on follower counts.
Do creators come to you, or do you go to them? Outbound sourcing means your team is still doing the hardest part of the work with better tools. Inbound applications mean interested creators arrive already wanting to work with your property. The difference shows up in your team's calendar every week.
Who makes the final approval decision? It should stay with your team. A good solution gives you better information to decide with. Be cautious of anything that decides for you, because brand fit is a judgment only the people who know your property can make.
Is it built for hospitality, or adapted to it? Hotel collaborations have specifics that product campaigns don't: dates, room nights, dining, plus-ones, seasonality. Anything adapted from a general-purpose tool will make you work around those gaps forever.
What does the reporting actually give you? Ask to see a real report. If your team will be rebuilding it by hand before it goes to whoever needs to see it, the time savings you were promised don't exist. It's also worth knowing what's realistically measurable in the first place, which we covered in the ROI myth.
Evolusen is the hospitality-specific option: hotel influencer marketing built around a network of vetted travel, lifestyle, and foodie creators. Creators apply directly to your property, and we also surface relevant applicants to you, so you're not waiting passively or sourcing manually. Every application arrives with verified, first-party audience data attached, and your team makes every approval decision.
That makes us a strong fit for properties, groups, and agencies that want the vetting handled without giving up control of who gets approved. It makes us a weaker fit if hospitality and travel are a small corner of a much broader, multi-category marketing program, since our network is specialized by design.
There's no single right answer, and the most expensive option isn't automatically the best one. What matters is matching the approach to your actual volume, your team's capacity, and how you want the vetting handled.
If you take one question from this, make it the first one: where does the audience data come from? Everything in influencer marketing rests on whether the audience is real, and most options answer that question the same way, by estimating from the outside.
Want to see what verified data on every applicant looks like? Book a demo →